George Orwell’s list:

The Autobiography of Benvenuto Cellini ” (a terrific liar, the very portrait of entertaining braggadocio).
“Looking Backward,”  by Edward Bellamy (at which point I started caring about politics).
“Crime and Punishment,”  by Fyodor Dostoevsky (the first novel to make me barf).
“The Decameron,”  by Giovanni Boccaccio.
“Journey to the End of the Night,”  by Louis-Ferdinand Celine (depressing! riveting).
“She,”  by Rider Haggard (oh, man, “who must be obeyed”).
“The Magic Mountain,”  by Thomas Mann (couldn’t make heads or tails of it yet, but there were certain stirrings).
“The Satyricon,”  by Petronius.
“Gargantua and Pantagruel,”  by Rabelais (so freaking weird).
“Letters to Theo,”  by Vincent van Gogh.
“Star of the Unborn,”  by Franz Werfel.

Creative thinking is exactly the same as the telling a joke.

When you tell a joke you link a number of things together in an original way and at the end of that connection you get a laugh (hopefully).

When you think creatively you make connections between things and generate new ideas (new for you.)

[S]imple but powerful techniques you can use to condition your brain to start being more creative:

  • Asking a question sends a signal to the brain that forces it to start looking to make new connections. The important factor is the quality of your questions!
  • Reading is a really good way to make new connections.
  • Become aware of your emotional state – change it with positive questions and make new positive connections that will add value to your life and the life of others.

[I]t highlights a powerful idea about how we might see the world. After all,  what really is a color? Just like the crayons, we’re taking something that has no natural boundaries – the frequencies of visible light – and dividing into convenient packages that we give a name.

Something eerily powerful is at work here. These cultures have largely independent histories, yet they somehow gravitate towards the same choices for how to slice up the visual cake. So you might ask,  is there something special about the colors that they choose?

Part II is also online:

The way that languages carve up the visual spectrum isn’t arbitrary. Different cultures with independent histories often end up with the same colors in their vocabulary. Of course, the word that they use for red might be quite different – red, rouge, laal, whatever. Yet the concept of redness, that vivid region of the visual spectrum that we associate with fire, strawberries, blood or ketchup, is something that most cultures share.

_ If you have a word to distinguish two colors, does that make you any better at telling them apart? _ More generally, does the linguistic baggage that we carry effect how we perceive the world? This study was designed to address Whorf’s idea head on.

As it happens, Whorf was right. Or rather, he was half right.

A pretty good overview of the recent history and developments of the disciplines dealing with our minds and happiness. Useful for people who don’t know the difference between psychotherapy and psychoanalysis, or can’t tell the difference between psychologists and psychiatrists. Especially important for those who still think Freudianism is the state of the art.

Freudianism sits alongside Marxism and Darwinism in the pantheon of modern theories held to be so revelatory that they not only gained the adherence of Western intelligentsia but shaped the broader culture. During the first half of the twentieth century, an air of intrigue and mystery hovered around Freud’s newly anointed practitioners. Psychotherapists occupied a strange universe, speaking in a language so incomprehensible but seemingly authoritative that it alternately awed and scared the average man on the street.

The popular rise of psychotherapy was intertwined with the popular rise of psychoanalysis. Freudian ideas had been popular with intellectuals and artists in the 1920s, but it was not until the 1950s, with the crisis in mental health, that they widely penetrated the public consciousness. Although few clinical psychologists of this era practiced Freudian psychoanalysis, they distilled Freud’s ideas into buzzwords, which appeared frequently in their conversations, writings, and speeches, thereby tapping into the public consciousness and identifying with people’s concerns.

Since Freud’s day, psychotherapy had generally been a slow, ongoing process of self-reflection and transformation, often requiring many sessions over years. Experiments with short-term therapy first began during the exigencies of World War II, when government needed to return battled-scarred soldiers to the front as soon as possible. But the real boom in short-term psychotherapy came with the growth of those community mental health centers in the 1960s. It represented an ad hoc response to the public’s urgent needs rather than an expert-driven application of abstruse theory — indeed, it grew out of a defiance of the experts.

Much as they had engaged in a broader philosophical struggle with psychiatry during the 1950s, therapists in the 1970s sought to counter the increasingly predominant view within primary care that unhappiness was biochemical in nature, and the best treatment for it pharmaceutical. Clinical psychologists, counselors, and social workers who performed therapy worked together to promote a rival view, changing their image to that of the caring professional. They began to present themselves less as disinterested scientists and more as “caregivers” eager to talk to patients about their everyday problems — unlike doctors, who just wanted to drug them.

The popularization of self-esteem, stress, and related ideas was not simply the work of the clinical psychologists who employed the terms professionally. It represented an ideological shift in American society. Whether the words an ideology uses are esoteric or common, the content must express the interests and aspirations of the people to which it is directed. The new “caring” ideology did just this.

It was only natural that [managed-care executives and laymen] should see in the innumerable obscure distinctions of psychoanalysis a manifestation of the inherent falsehood of Freudian doctrine.

Gone are the days when therapists were dedicated to the doctrines of Freud and Jung, when the field was suffused with an air of priestly sanctity, heavy with the odors of tradition and authority.

Once a consecrated priesthood, therapists today walk along the smooth road of ordinary duty. They help people with their everyday problems. They speak in a casual manner and even crack jokes. They are friendly. They smile. They differ neither outwardly nor inwardly from the clients they serve, for whom therapy has become a useful organization, a convenient and respectable appendage to existence, a sometimes necessary form of artificial friendship.

Short article adapted from _ How Will You Measure Your Life? _ by Clayton M. Christensen, James Allworth, and Karen Dillon…

If you study the root causes of business disasters and management missteps, you’ll often find a predisposition toward endeavors that offer immediate gratification. … In the words of Andy Grove, former chairman and chief executive officer of Intel (INTC): “To understand a company’s strategy, look at what they actually do rather than what they say they will do.”

In many ways, people face the same resource management dilemma as corporations.

Here is a way to frame the investments we make in the strategy that becomes our lives: We have resources — which include personal time, energy, talent, and wealth — and we are using them to try to expand several “businesses” in our personal lives.

Bottom line: If the decisions you make about where you invest your blood, sweat, and tears are not consistent with the person you aspire to be, you’ll never become that person. As you continue on your life’s journey, allocate your resources wisely—at work and home.

A selection of brief life lessons by Nobel prize-winning psychologist, Daniel, Kahneman.

Human beings cannot comprehend  very large or very small numbers. It would be useful for us to acknowledge that fact.

My main work has concerned judgment and decision-making . But I never felt I was studying the stupidity of mankind in the third person. I always felt I was studying my own mistakes.

Happiness is complicated. There are two components. One is strongly genetic; the second is a question of how you feel at any moment. I am pretty content, but I had a very pessimistic mother, and I’ve always been known as a pessimist.

This probably sounds obvious, but it’s good that research backs it up.

Being cut off from work email significantly reduces stress and allows employees to focus far better, according to a new study by UC Irvine and U.S. Army researchers.

“We found that when you remove email from workers’ lives, they multitask less and experience less stress,” said UCI informatics professor Gloria Mark.