An effect describes an observable phenomenon where something causes another thing to happen; often, this cause is not fully understood. Well-known effects include the Greenhouse Effect and the Placebo Effect; but scientists, psychologists, and other researchers have far too much curiosity to stop at “well-known.” Have you ever wondered, for instance, why Cheerios tend to clump together—and head to the edges—when they float in a bowl of milk? Why do Brazil nuts always end up at the top of a jar of nuts? Why do your friends always think they’re right about everything? Why does the shower curtain stick to you? Read on!

  1. Cheerios effect The natural tendency of small objects floating in water to attract one another—and to head toward the edges of the container.
  2. Brazil Nut effect [W]hen a group of different-sized particles is shaken vertically, the largest rise to the top.
  3. False-consensus effect In general, people have a tendency to internalize what they believe (as well as the ways they act, think, speak, and so on) as “normal” and correct. This is likely due in part to what’s known in psychology as the “availability heuristic,” the process of making decisions based on what immediately comes to mind. Given that we spend time with friend, family, and others who generally share many of our opinions and beliefs, this insular social grouping can contribute to the false-consensus effect.
  4. Hot chocolate effect Also known as the “allassonic effect,” the phenomenon is caused by the change of the speed of sound in the mug as the various new elements are introduced and as these new elements change. Specifically, the density of the bubbles created then the powder hits the liquid changes, causing a change in the sound that passes through them.
  5. Lake Wobegon effect [A] phenomenon whereby people consider themselves to be better than others—in other words, above average—with regard to specific abilities, skills, performance, and intellect.
  6. Name-letter effect Controversial studies have suggested that there appear to be significant correlations between the letters in peoples’ names and certain life choices they make and successes (or failures) they experience.
  7. Autokinetic effect When you’re in total darkness—say, in the woods at night—and you see a small point of light, stare at it. After awhile, that stationary light will appear to move in front of you, despite the fact that it isn’t moving at all.
  8. Shower curtain effect You’re taking a shower […] Then, with no provocation, the shower curtain simply reaches out and sticks to you.
  9. Sylvia Plath effect [A] theory that seeks to explain the apparently disproportionate number of female poets to suffer from mental illness. More broadly, it is claimed that poets of either gender—and even more broadly than that, creative writers—succumb more easily to depression and other mental illness than other writers, as well as other celebrities.
  10. Wagon-wheel effect [T]he optical illusion wherein spoked wheels seem to rotate differently than one might expect given the direction in which the vehicle is moving.

Read the article for more details.

Studies and analysis of people’s speech shows that a lot of personal communication can be achieved through what we think of as filler words. “I mean,” acts as a clarification or an emphasis. “You know,” can be used as cue for the other person to reply. “Um” and “uh” are signals that we’re thinking about something and the other person shouldn’t jump in until we’re finished. They also indicate that new, more complex information is coming.

Essentially, when your brain is finally given a moment of a rest, those subconscious thoughts can bubble up to the surface and keep you awake. Unfortunately, you can’t simply switch your brain off just so you can get some sleep. To really avoid those restless nights the best thing you can do is get better sleep and train yourself to fall asleep quicker. If all else fails, a little math might at least direct that consciousness spotlight onto something more mundane.

Book Review: "Stumbling on Happiness" by Daniel Gilbert

It seems like an easy question: what makes us happy?  The author, a professor of psychology at Harvard, argues that we can’t be relied upon to give a decent answer.  In the foreword he writes: “This book is about a puzzle that many thinkers have pondered over the last two millennia, and it uses their ideas (and a few of my own) to explain why we seem to know so little about the hearts and minds of the people we are about to become”.  He covers psychology, cognition, neuroscience, economics and philosophy to make his argument.

Findings include:
• Happiness is very subjective.  As they say, “one man’s meat is another man’s poison”.
• We’re not very good at predicting the future.
• We’re not even particularly reliable remembering the past.
• Our memories are selective.
• Our thinking is subject to biases.
• Major events which we expect would have a lasting impact on our happiness (e.g. winning the lottery or becoming handicapped), will affect us in the short term, but then we will eventually return to our individual “default” level of happiness.

When making decisions about the future, and how that affects our happiness, we often resort to thoughts and imagination.  But there are three major shortcomings of imagination:

 1. Its tendency to fill in and leave out without telling us (Realism).

 2. Its tendency to project the present onto the future (Presentism).

 3. Its failure to recognise that things look different once they happen - in particular, that bad things will look a whole lot better (Rationalisation).

So, if imagination leads us astray, what are we to do when trying to make important decisions?  According to the author, the best advice is to ask others who have already made similar decisions to see if they’re happy or not with their choices.

The author also makes some potentially controversial claims regarding life as a “belief-transmission game”.  In particular, we believe in the joy of money and the joy of children.  Regarding money, research shows that beyond a certain amount, additional income does not lead to increased happiness.  Regarding children, research studies show that marital satisfaction actually dips just after the birth and only picks up when the nest empties.

Overall, the author makes a persuasive case, often with humour.  There is no simple, universal formula for finding happiness.  We probably shouldn’t try to think too much about making ourselves happy, since we have unreliable ideas on the subject.  Instead, we should take each day as it comes, accept what we have, and make the most of the situations we find ourselves in. And where possible, seek the advice of people more experienced than ourselves.

Amazon product page

Book Review: "The Resiliency Advantage" by Al Siebert

Resiliency, the ability to adapt and cope with life’s changes, is not an innate talent.  It is a skill that can be learnt just like any other.  The book’s subtitle is: “Master Change, Thrive Under Pressure, and Bounce Back from Setbacks”.  The author is a clinical psychologist and researcher.

The book looks at the attributes of highly resilient people: those suffering chronic pain or life-changing disabilities, and survivors of terrible adversity.  The examples and anecdotes are backed up by research findings.  Attributes that help build resilience include the ability to solve problems, curiosity, willingness to try new and possibly uncomfortable or challenging things, and openness to serendipity.  This last point helps turn accidents or misfortune into positives.

Resiliency requires a healthy view of three aspect of one’s “self”: self-esteem, self-confidence and self-concept.  An interesting argument the author makes is that people who never complain and always try to please others (i.e. to be a “good child”) can actually harm their ability to cope with their problems.  Detachment and a modest level of selfishness can help people become resilient.

The author challenges the concept of stress.  Often the thing causing stress is not the real problem, but rather how we choose to internalise it and react to it.  Just as straining muscles in an exercise routine helps strengthen them, coping with the strains of everyday life helps strengthen our “resiliency” muscles.  This makes me wonder if many parents are actually harming their children by always trying to make their children’s lives as easy as possible.  Too much sheltering from helicopter parents could backfire when the child grows up and has to face life’s challenges on their own.

Amazon product page

It doesn’t matter whether you are a chronic worrier without an official diagnosis or battling severe obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), a neurobehavioral disorder that involves repetitive unwanted thoughts and rituals. The steps to overcome faulty beliefs and develop healthy patterns of thinking are the same.

When we worry, the use of energy is consistently higher than normal in the orbital cortex, the underside of the front of the brain. It’s working overtime, heating up, which is exactly what is the PET scans show. Too many “what if’s” and your orbital cortex as shown in a PET scan will light up in beautiful neon colors, like the walls of my daughter’s bedroom. However, with repeated cognitive-behavioral exercises, you can cool it down and return your PET scan to the boring black and white.

In their book, The OCD Workbook, Bruce M. Hyman, Ph.D., and Cherry Pedrick, RN, explain the ABCDs of faulty beliefs. It’s a four-step cycle of insanity:

A = Activity Event and Intrusive Thought, Image or Urge. (What if I didn’t lock the door? What if I upset her? I know I upset her.)

B = Faulty Belief About the Intrusive Thought. (If I don’t say the rosary, I’m going to hell. If I made a mistake in my presentation, I will get fired.)

C = Emotional Consequences: Anxiety, Doubt, and Worry. (I am a horrible person for upsetting her. I keep making mistakes … I will never be able to keep a job. I hate myself.)

D = Neutralizing Ritual or Avoidance. (I need to say the rosary to insure I’m not going to hell. I should avoid my friend who I upset and my boss so that he can’t tell me I’m fired.)

One of the best approaches to manage a case of the worries and/or OCD is the four-step self-treatment method by Schwartz, explained in Brain Lock,

Step 1: Relabel.

In this step you squeeze a bit of distance between the thought and you. […]

Step 2: Reattribute.

[…] By considering that colorful picture, you take the problem from your emotional center to your physiological being. This helps me immensely because I feel less attached to it and less a failure for being able to tame and keep it under control. […]

Step 3: Refocus.

If it’s at all possible, turn your attention to some other activity that can distract you from the anxiety. […]

Step 4: Revalue.

This involves calling out the unwanted thoughts and giving yourself a pep talk on why you want to do everything you can to free yourself from the prison of obsessive thinking. You are basically devaluing the worrying as soon as it tries to intrude.

According to a new analysis of 400 published scientific papers, the old adage that “music is medicine” may literally be true. Canadian psychologists from McGill University have shown that the neurochemical benefits of music can boost the body’s immune system, reduce anxiety, and help regulate mood. The time has come, say the researchers, for doctors and therapists to start taking music much more seriously.

Chanda and Levitin have shown that there are plenty of studies linking music to specific neurochemical processes. In their analysis, which surveyed over 400 papers, they looked for patterns in the scientific evidence supporting the claim that music can affect brain chemistry in a positive way. They succeeded in isolating four areas where music can help:

Reward, motivation, and pleasure (to help with eating disorders, as an example)

Stress and arousal (to help reduce anxiety)

Immunity (to strengthen the body’s immune system and slow-down age related decline)

Social affiliation (to assist in trust building and social bonding)

50 Amazing Galaxy Pictures that You Must See

They are the best images of galaxies captured by powerful telescopes of NASA/ESA/ESO, etc. […]

Apart from optical or visible light, instruments on NASA’s and ESA’s powerful telescopes can detect infrared rays, ultraviolet rays, X-rays, gamma rays, and other radiation emitted by stars, galaxies, nebulae, etc. The invisible spectrum of the electromagnetic radiation can reveal features that can’t be seen in the visible light spectrum.

Since our eyes can only see optical or visible light, we have to use different colors to represent infrared, ultraviolet, X-ray and other radiation. This is how the so-called ‘false-color’ or ‘color-coded’ galaxy pictures are made. In the pages that follow, you’ll see both true-color and false-color (or color-coded) galaxy pictures.

Pictured above: Sombrero Galaxy (M104) in Visible Light

Are you disgusted, disgruntled and disheveled? Well, unfortunately you’re never going to be gusted, gruntled or sheveled. Disgusted, disgruntled and disheveled are what you might call “lonely negatives.” They’re negative words whose positive partners have vanished or never existed in the first place.

The twelve “lonely negative” words:

  1. disgust

  2. disheveled

  3. inscrutable

  4. ineffable

  5. disappoint

  6. indelible

  7. impeccable

  8. indolent

  9. indefatigable

  10. incessant

  11. reckless

  12. disgruntled

Read the article for their origins.